Book censorship in New Zealand has a long history, dating back to the colonial period. Initially, the Customs Department had the authority to refuse entry to books considered indecent. Over time, other branches of government, such as the police, Post Office, courts, Executive Council, Cabinet, and the Department of Justice, became involved in book censorship. In 1963, the book censorship system was reformed with the establishment of the Indecent Publications Tribunal. This was the first organization in New Zealand dedicated to the censorship of books. Prior to this, there was no requirement for banned book lists to be made public.
The Tribunal banned three books and almost 3000 comics and magazines by the end of the 1960s. The treatment of homosexuality in book censorship changed significantly with the Homosexual Law Reform Act 1986. The Indecent Publications Tribunal was replaced by the Office of Film and Literature Classification in 1994. As of September 2011, 1319 books have been banned and an additional 728 restricted in some way.
Key Takeaways:
- New Zealand has a long history of book censorship, dating back to the colonial period.
- The Indecent Publications Tribunal, established in 1963, was the first organization dedicated to book censorship.
- Homosexuality in book censorship changed significantly with the Homosexual Law Reform Act 1986.
- The Office of Film and Literature Classification replaced the Indecent Publications Tribunal in 1994.
- As of September 2011, 1319 books have been banned and 728 restricted in New Zealand.
The role of the Office of Film and Literature Classification
The Office of Film and Literature Classification in New Zealand plays a crucial role in the classification and censorship of books and other forms of media. As the governing body, they have the authority to ban or restrict books that are deemed to promote extreme violence or certain explicit sexual acts. While the banning of books is rare in modern times, restrictions based on content are still put in place to ensure the protection of society.
Some examples of books that have been banned or restricted in recent years include the manifesto of the Christchurch terrorist and the Secrets Of Methamphetamine Manufacture 8th Edition. These books are believed to have the potential to cause harm to society and are therefore subject to strict classification measures. The Office of Film and Literature Classification takes its classification process seriously, likening it to the careful handling of toxic material by an asbestos removal crew.
It is important to note that books can be re-evaluated after three years and may be removed from the banned or restricted list. This allows for a continuous assessment of their impact and relevance, taking into consideration the evolving societal norms and values. The Office of Film and Literature Classification aims to strike a balance between freedom of expression and the need to protect vulnerable audiences from potentially harmful content.
The Classification Criteria:
- Promotion of extreme violence
- Explicit sexual acts involving coercion, exploitation of children, bestiality, necrophilia, use of urine, or use of excrement
Through their classification process, the Office of Film and Literature Classification ensures that books adhere to these criteria and takes into account the context and potential impact of their content. The classification decisions are intended to protect the well-being and safety of individuals while still respecting the principles of freedom of expression.
Controversies and Debates Surrounding Book Censorship
Book censorship in New Zealand has always been a topic of controversy, sparking debates about freedom of speech and the boundaries of expression. The ongoing discussions delve into the balance between protecting vulnerable groups and promoting a diverse range of ideas and perspectives. Critics of book censorship argue that it suppresses freedom of expression and limits individuals’ right to choose what they read. On the other hand, advocates believe that certain books can be harmful and that restrictions are necessary for societal protection.
The case of Ted Dawe’s book “Into the River” serves as a prime example of the tensions surrounding book censorship in New Zealand. Initially banned in 2013 due to its offensive language and sexual content, the decision was eventually overturned following public outcry. This incident ignited further discourse on the role of censorship in a modern and diverse society.
The Impact of Cancel Culture
In recent years, the rise of cancel culture has added a new dimension to the debate on book censorship. Cancel culture refers to the public boycott or condemnation of individuals or works deemed to be offensive or inappropriate. Some argue that cancel culture can lead to self-censorship among authors and publishers, as they fear repercussions for exploring controversial or challenging themes. This phenomena has raised concerns about the potential stifling of creativity and the narrowing of cultural discourse.
It is important to note that while book censorship can be seen as a means of protecting society from harmful content, it also has significant implications for authors and publishers. When a book is banned or restricted, it can limit the reach and distribution of the work, potentially impacting the livelihoods of those involved. Authors may face backlash and criticism, while publishers may need to navigate the complexities of censorship laws and regulations.
The Way Forward
As discussions surrounding book censorship continue to evolve, it is crucial to find a balance between freedom of expression and protecting vulnerable groups. Open dialogue and engagement are necessary to address concerns and explore alternative approaches to censorship. Additionally, promoting media literacy and critical thinking can empower individuals to make informed choices about the content they engage with. The future of book censorship in New Zealand lies in finding innovative solutions that respect both freedom of speech and the values of a diverse society.
The impact of book censorship on authors and publishers
Book censorship can have a significant impact on authors and publishers, affecting their creativity, reach, and audience. When a book is banned or restricted, it limits the freedom of expression and can hinder the spread of diverse ideas and perspectives.
For authors, the consequences of censorship go beyond the loss of potential readership. They may face criticism, backlash, or even threats for their controversial or sensitive content. The fear of censorship can also lead to self-censorship, where authors may avoid exploring certain topics or expressing their true thoughts, resulting in a stifling of creativity and intellectual discourse.
Similarly, publishers are faced with the challenge of navigating censorship laws and regulations. They must make difficult decisions about which books to publish, considering the potential backlash, legal implications, and impact on their reputation and sales. This can limit the variety of voices and ideas available to readers, ultimately narrowing the scope of literary exploration.
The impact on freedom of expression
- Censorship restricts the free flow of ideas and limits access to a diverse range of perspectives.
- Authors and publishers may feel pressured to self-censor, leading to a stifling of creativity.
- The fear of censorship can deter authors from addressing important and controversial topics.
- Censorship hampers intellectual discourse and prevents the development of critical thinking.
The challenges for authors and publishers
- Authors face criticism, backlash, and threats for their controversial or sensitive content.
- Self-censorship can hinder creativity and result in a narrower range of ideas being explored.
- Publishers must navigate complex censorship laws and make difficult decisions about which books to publish.
- Censorship can limit the variety of voices and ideas available to readers.
While it is important to consider the protection of vulnerable groups, finding a balance between freedom of expression and restrictions is crucial. Open dialogue, education, and promoting critical thinking can help foster a society that encourages diverse ideas and perspectives while ensuring the well-being of its members.
The future of book censorship in New Zealand
In the rapidly evolving digital age, the landscape of book censorship is undergoing significant changes. As traditional methods of classification and restriction struggle to keep up with the vast amount of online content, new models and approaches are needed to adapt to this digital reality. Chief Censor David Shanks acknowledges the challenges this presents and emphasizes the importance of finding alternatives to outright censorship.
One key aspect of shaping the future of book censorship lies in education. Empowering individuals to navigate and comprehend the content they encounter is crucial, especially when it comes to books that touch upon sensitive or controversial topics. Education can play a vital role in fostering critical thinking and providing the tools necessary to evaluate different perspectives, allowing people to make informed choices about what they read.
The future will require a delicate balance between protecting freedom of expression and safeguarding vulnerable groups. Rather than resorting to blanket bans or strict restrictions, the Office of Film and Literature Classification is focusing on mitigating potential harms through research, engagement with industry and the public, and innovative approaches to content classification. By doing so, they aim to address the challenges of the digital age while still upholding the values and principles that underpin freedom of expression.
As society continues to grapple with these complexities, the debates and controversies surrounding book censorship in New Zealand will undoubtedly evolve. It is an ongoing journey that requires open dialogue, thoughtful consideration, and continuous adaptation to ensure that the right balance is struck between the freedom of expression and the protection of vulnerable groups.
Page Contents